וַיְצַ֣ו מֹשֶׁ֔ה אֶת־בְּנֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל לֵאמֹ֑ר זֹ֣את הָאָ֗רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֨ר תִּתְנַחֲל֤וּ אֹתָהּ֙ בְּגוֹרָ֔ל אֲשֶׁר֙ צִוָּ֣ה יְהוָ֔ה לָתֵ֛ת לְתִשְׁעַ֥ת הַמַּטּ֖וֹת וַחֲצִ֥י הַמַּטֶּֽה׃
At iniutos ni Moises sa mga anak ng Israel, na sinasabi: “Ito ang lupaing mamanahin ninyo sa pamamagitan ng palabunutan, na iniutos ng Walang-Hanggan na ibigay sa siyam na lipi at sa kalahating lipi.
Jerusalem Talmud Kiddushin
HALAKHAH: “On condition that I possess a bet kor of arable land,” etc. Rebbi Ḥananiah the son of Rebbi Hillel asked113He asks against R. Ḥanaiah ben Gamliel.: If somebody said, my son A should perform action X and receive property Y, and the rest of my sons shall inherit my properties; if he performs, he takes, but if he does not perform, he does not take114This does not disinherit A from sharing with his brothers.. Or maybe it is a difference since it is written: “To give to Nine and a half tribes.115Num. 34:13. This verse clearly excludes the Transjordan tribes from property in Canaan. Therefore, R. Ḥanaiah ben Gamliel’s argument is correct.” It is as if he said, my son A should perform action X and receive property Y, and the rest of my sons shall inherit my properties; if he performs, he takes, but if he does not perform, he does not take from here or from there.